![]() |
![]() |
|
Career Planning:
\\|//
|
Something like... Hey boss, I know we're supposed to get these 4,321 things done within the next few months, and I'd never question the wisdom of this list (..ahem...), but I've got some suggestions for which three should be my priority for the next few weeks. Of course, (..ahem...), I'll keep the other 4,318 movingforward while I focus on these three. Or... These are the three things I d recommend we focus on first. Make sense? (Of course, your Pass-On-Too-Much manager will want to up your three things to five or ten or twenty. On to Step 4...) 4. Keep shortening the timeframe (from months to weeks to, possibly, days) until, as partners, you both agree: "These three." Don't challenge the length of the entire list or your manager's inability to prioritize. Instead, just keep narrowing the timeframe... Boss, thanks for helping me see that there's only 347 things that have to get done this month. Now, can we talk about which to-do's need to be checked off by this Friday? ...Only 47? Great! Now, which three of those should I focus on first? Based on our
long-term objective, I think these three things need and clarify upcoming, short-term To-Do's. If you keep the timeframe short enough, most every manager appreciates help in clarifying what comes next. Most people avoid dealing with their manager's inability to get focused because they don't know how to confront the problem without confronting the person. By continually narrowing the timeframe, you can get your manager to prioritize without going toe-to-toe. It's an indirect approach that some have called the Nibble Method: taking small steps to get priorities set. The upside is that you avoid confrontation. The downside: you'll have to continually go back for another nibble of focus. That's why some prefer a more direct method... Hey boss, I'm
not leaving your office until you If that works for you, go for it! Both approaches yield the same thing: less work, greater focus. The only difference is where you spend your energy. People who have followed the steps on this page report a success rate of 80%, and better, in dealing with managers who pass on too much. Instead of saying "no" to too much work, these people have figured out that if they partner with their manager on setting better priorities, they actually reduce the overall flow of work that comes at them. Equally important, they find that the vital few priorities they coaxed out of their manager end up being the ones on which they're evaluated at year's end. Do your homework. Tackle short-term, bite-size chunks of prioritization. And make it easy for your manager to approve your suggestions. Save him time and don't make him think he's got to go to his boss, and you will be able to continually redirect the flow of work coming at you. I promise! (A promise that I can guarantee because of the First Law of Workplace Behavior: Make it easier for people to do things your way, and you'll get your way more often.) |
|||||