The opposite of a correct statement is a false statement. The
opposite of a profound truth may well be another profound truth. -Niels
Bohr
Sometimes flipping things around provides a powerful new solution. Even
if it's not a better solution for the problem at hand, it may well offer
a useful solution to a different problem. Think of symmetry as
translation with a twist. It takes an existing solution in a given
context and turns it around to get a new perspective.
Take pricing, for example. The standard way of doing business is to have
the seller state the price. Airlines advertise their price, and you, the
customer, can take it or leave it. But is there another way of doing
business? Jay Walker's Priceline.com made a big splash by turning the
tables on pricing. Instead of having airlines offer prices that
customers might accept, Walker set up a system in which the consumers
offered prices that airlines might accept. This is a pure example of
symmetry.
Let's try a few simple symmetry exercises. As you will see, the hardest
aspect of the symmetry tool is having the courage to turn something
around. The other way of doing something often seems so foolish that you
censor yourself before you even start.
For example, recall our family-friendly version of DVDs that came from
the airline or television translation. We could also have arrived at
this idea using symmetry. One of the advantages of a DVD is that it
typically comes with more material than was shown in the theater or on
the video. There is the director's cut, often with extra scenes and more
explicit violence or sex.
Let's try turning this around. Instead of providing more material,
could the DVDs provide less? At first blush, this doesn't make any
sense. Why would anyone want less? But instead of giving us the more
explicit extra scenes of violence and sex, what about giving us an
option to have these scenes cut a bit to make the movie more suitable
for teens? And by providing this service, studios might even make the
family-value hawks in Congress a bit happier.
Volunteering Not to Answer: Everyone knows that when a teacher asks a
question, students signal that they want to answer by raising their
hands. What would it mean to flip this around? Well, of course, it would
mean that students who raised their hand don't want to answer. Just
because you can flip something around doesn't mean that you would want
to. In this case, it seems pretty ridiculous to have students who don't
want to answer raising their hands in the class.
But wait a minute. Changing the meaning of hand-raising could offer some
distinct pedagogical advantages. Isn't it better to force the students
who aren't prepared to go to the trouble and embarrassment of raising
their hands? Maybe, maybe not. The point is that it's a closer horse
race than you might think. As an experiment, Ian tried flipping the
meaning of raising your hand and found that it improved the quality of
class participation-particularly among shy students.
This is a classic solution in search of a problem. We start with an
existing solution (raising your hand to answer a question), flip its
meaning, and then ask whether it can work even better or work in a
different context. In this case, it turns out that flipping the meaning
of silence increases class participation. It's harder to be labeled
uncool for just sitting there.
Although professors know all too well that raising your hand can be
deemed uncool, the impetus for the idea was not initially to solve this
problem. It was instead to simply do the thought experiment of flipping
the default meaning of silence and to try to imagine what would happen.
.
You probably remember the old joke about the soldiers who are asked to
step forward if they want to volunteer for a dangerous mission. But just
like Ian's class, the joke's punch line uses symmetry to flip the
meaning of inaction-because what happens is the soldiers who do not wish
to volunteer take a step backward.
Black Socks with Sandals: Hundreds of fashion magazines give advice on
what to wear. In the U.K., Tinny Woodall and Susannah Constantine
created a smashing BBC show and best-selling book with their essential
guide, What Not to Wear.
Video Rentals. Let's keep flipping, but in a very different context. Is
there any aspect of video rentals that could be flipped around? Well,
having the customers rent to the stores doesn't make much sense." What
about the "onerous" task of rewinding? Everyone knows that polite
renters should rewind their videotapes before they return them. And most
rental stores try to enforce this norm with "Please Be Kind and Rewind"
stickers and the threat of rewind charges.
But what would happen if we flipped around the norm and asked people to
rewind at the beginning instead of the end of their rental? The downside
is that renters would have to endure a bit of delayed gratification
while waiting for the movie to rewind before watching. But the upside
is that the task suddenly becomes impossible to shirk. You can't watch
the movie unless you do your duty and rewind it. By simply flipping
around the norm, video stores would avoid the hassle of enforcing the
current norm.
We guessed that somewhere a video store would have figured this out.
Sure enough, Star Video in Berkeley has the initial-rewind policy in
place. Now, by the way, is a good time to put on your translation hats.
Can you think of any other annoying tasks that might be better done
before instead of after?
As teachers, we immediately think about the idea of cleaning the
chalkboard. Although some professors insist on erasing their work at the
end of class, others forget or shirk. But again, if we flipped the norm,
there would be no way to shirk, because you couldn't teach Hamlet
without erasing the prior class's accounting notes.
Interestingly, there is one arena in which this do-it-beforehand idea is
firmly in place-the Laundromat. The Laundromats could, of course, ask
their patrons to "please be kind and clean the screen after you use the
dryer," but most lint screens say "please clean before each use" - not
after. Again, the "before" norm eliminates the possibility of shirking.
These examples so far illustrate a common element of symmetry. In each
case, we are changing the default-the meaning of silence or inaction. By
default, we don't mean not paying your mortgage. We mean the preset
condition that will prevail if you take no action, such as your word
processor's default one-inch left-hand margin, which you must actively
change if you want something else.
As we look around, we see many cases in which the default could go
either way. Sometimes we will argue that one default option works much
better than the other-and that the existing legal default gets it
backward. Those of you who aren't lawyers may be surprised to learn that
laws are not all about forcing choices for people. It isn't "you must do
this and you can't do that." Rather, many laws are just about
establishing what rules obtain if people fail to "opt out."
Trespassing in the Woods
Existing default: Allowed unless property is posted with "No
Trespassing" sign
Opposite default: No trespassing unless explicitly permitted
Right Turn on Red
Existing default: Allowed except where posted "No Right Turn on Red"
Opposite default: Prohibited except where explicitly permitted
Organ Donation:
Existing default: Not permitted unless prior consent has been given
Opposite default: Permitted unless prior denial has been given
Contributions to a 401(k) Plan:
Existing default: No contribution unless you opt in
Opposite default: Automatic contribution unless you opt out
One aspect of the symmetry tool is to learn to look for defaults in
business (video rewind), law (trespassing), and everyday life ("regrets
only"), and to ask whether flipping the default makes better sense.
It's
More or Less Symmetrical: While experimenting with the default option is
an example of symmetry, it is just one of many ways to employ this tool.
Thinking about how to do things the other way around is a way to look
for new business opportunities.
Consider, for example, one of the great innovations of the 1970s: the
automated teller machine (ATM). Banks cooperate with each other through
the ATM network to allow their customers to withdraw money from each
other's banks. The result is a great cost saving for banks, as they need
not duplicate all of each other's branches. Great idea, but to see
what's missing, put on the symmetry hat.
What's missing is the deposit side of the ATM idea. Why can't a customer
make a deposit to any bank from any other bank? In the U.K. and
Australia, a person can go to a teller inside any bank and make a
deposit to any other bank. But to our knowledge, no ATM system will
allow cross-bank deposits. For example, a Citibank customer cannot make
deposits to her account from a Chase machine.
To be symmetric about symmetry, we should also recognize that less
symmetric can dominate the symmetrical one. Thus in some
cases, the trick is to break the symmetry. The one-way toll is the
classic example. It's better to pay in only one direction.
Right turn on red is another asymmetry. Left turn on red doesn't work as
well, because you would be forced to cross traffic. Ah, but this
suggests that left turn on red onto a one-way street would also be a
good idea. Here again, California led the way.
Creativity
requires spending time "doing nothing" - workaholism guarantees its
death
_______________________________________________________________________________